Every AI in your jurisdiction graded. Every provider certified by your agency. Every certification generates revenue for your national budget. Production-ready today. Adaptable to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or your national law.
Every AI provider operating in your country, scored A–F on the same measurement standard. Trends, domain breakdown, enforcement actions. Live. Built for a regulator, not for an engineer.
ONTO is complementary to every major AI governance framework, not a replacement. Your framework is the law. ONTO is the measurement layer that makes the law enforceable per response — signed, reproducible, admissible.
€17B spent annually on AI compliance across the EU — with no tool that verifies AI cites real sources. ONTO is that tool.
| Your framework | ONTO role |
|---|---|
| EU AI Act · Art. 9 (risk management) | Confidence levels shown. Won't fabricate what it doesn't know. |
| EU AI Act · Art. 13 (transparency) | Every response includes source, author, data. Explains "why." |
| EU AI Act · Art. 43 (conformity assessment) | Cryptographic proof. Every response tracked. Immutable. |
| NIST AI RMF (trustworthy AI characteristics) | Deterministic measurement for "Valid & Reliable" and "Accountable". |
| ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management system) | Signed reproducible evidence artifact for operational-controls audit. |
| Singapore Model AI Governance | Quantitative instrument for sectoral AI quality assessment. |
| Your national law (UZ · UAE · TR · KZ · SA · JP · DE · others in development) | Adaptable mapping — R1–R7 tuned to your regulatory priorities. |
Frameworks are maps. ONTO is the thermometer.
ONTO does not replace your agency. ONTO gives your agency the infrastructure to become the national certification authority for AI — the way you already do for finance, pharma, and telecoms.
AI governance is usually a spending line. ONTO inverts the model. Your agency collects fees from every AI provider operating in your market. You set the floor. The numbers below are conservative.
Sovereign by default. Infrastructure runs on your soil. Zero data leaves the national perimeter. No dependency on EU or US standards bodies. You are first — or you follow someone who was.
Finance, healthcare, legal, government, education, defense. One measurement, tuned per sector via a specific subset of R1–R7 rules.
We offer a three-month pilot on your agency's own systems. Zero cost. Zero obligation. After the pilot, you have compliance data no country currently possesses.
ONTO maintains a public registry of every formal proposal submitted to a national regulatory body. Each entry is timestamped, archived in version control and indexed by Wayback Machine. The record cannot be denied or revised.
| Country | Submitted | Recipient · Framework · National context | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇿 Uzbekistan | 2026-04-09 | Ministry of Digital Development · Buyruq 3787 · PQ-358 · Strategy "Raqamli O'zbekiston 2030" · $1B AI investment, 100+ government AI projects, no quality measurement instrument. First-mover position in CIS. | ACTIVE |
| 🇦🇪 UAE | — | MBZUAI · TDRA · DSI · AI Strategy 2031 · $169B invested in AI infrastructure. Falcon built, MBZUAI launched. The measurement standard layer is missing. | PENDING |
| 🇹🇷 Turkey | — | Digital Transformation Office · BTK · AI Bill 2024 · First country in history to ban an AI system (Grok, July 2025). Trustworthy AI Seal proposed but not built. Bridge position between EU and Middle East. | PENDING |
| 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | — | SDAIA · National AI Strategy 2030 · $40B+ AI investment program. Quality-control infrastructure for portfolio-wide measurement. | PENDING |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | — | IMDA · Model AI Governance Framework · AI Verify (voluntary toolkit). Mature governance infrastructure that requires a quantitative enforcement layer. | PENDING |
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | — | MSIT · AI Basic Act in force · Companies require certification clarity. K-AI national quality designation opportunity. | PENDING |
| 🇯🇵 Japan | — | METI · AI Guidelines · AI Basic Act pending · Guidelines without measurement teeth. Path to enforceable national quality standard. | PENDING |
| 🇩🇪 Germany | — | BSI · EU AI Act implementation · €17B/yr EU compliance spending. First EU member state to deploy operational AI measurement instrument. | PENDING |
| 🇺🇸 USA | — | EO 14110 (rescinded January 2025) · NIST AI RMF (voluntary) · State patchwork (CA SB-1047 vetoed, CO AI Act 2026, NYC AEDT). Largest AI economy without federal enforcement instrument. | PENDING |
| 🇨🇳 China | — | CAC · Generative AI Measures (2023) · Algorithm Recommendation Provisions · Deep Synthesis Provisions. Mature regulatory framework requiring cross-border verification layer for international compatibility. | PENDING |
| 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | — | AISI · pro-innovation approach (no horizontal AI law) · sectoral regulators. Principles without measurement; ONTO converts principles into auditable scores. | PENDING |
| 🇮🇳 India | — | MeitY · IndiaAI Mission ($1.25B) · sectoral approach. National sovereign AI buildout requires deployment-stage quality measurement. | PENDING |
| 🇫🇷 France | — | DGE · EU AI Act · sovereign-AI push (Mistral, national cloud). National measurement layer for sovereign-AI ecosystem. | PENDING |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | — | PL 2338/2023 AI Bill in legislature · LGPD precedent. Latin America first-mover position on enforceable AI quality standard. | PENDING |
Engagement and non-engagement with a publicly registered enforcement instrument are both recordable regulatory decisions. Future audits, parliamentary inquiries and judicial review may reference this registry to establish whether a regulatory body acted with due diligence within its mandate at a given point in time.
Live demonstration on any vendor's AI: same model scores 0.18 without ONTO, 0.82 with. See it yourself →